To Bear or Not to Bear

I was reading somewhere recently about how the “bear” community has become less inclusive lately and more intolerant of anyone who doesn’t fit the mold. It was bound to happen eventually. This is the problem w/sub-cultures. They start out with the purpose to unite those who fit a certain quality but then turn sour when said group becomes more prolific. I hate to say it but I’ve noticed it a bit myself over the last few years.

It is human nature to want to belong and feel connected to others like ourselves. Its vital to our growth to find others we can identify with. Growing up generally ostracized and excluded by society at large, I think the need is that much greater among gays. [1]and by “gay”, I include the LGBT umbrella of folks. Being able to identify with others helps reinforce our own self-worth and self-image. Speaking from my own experiences, I can tell you the drive to belong can be very powerful. I spent many years pretending to be someone I wasn’t in an effort to belong and just as many years figuring out how to belong when I didn’t really identify wholly with one group or another. It definitely stunted my own self-worth. And while I didn’t take the darker path, the drive to fit-in can lead to destructive behaviors.

While many find “coming out” a completely liberating experience, others often find it less than appealing and almost anti-climatic. While the basic same-sex attraction can be a very unifying experience, it is by no means all-encompassing. Being gay is an intrinsic part of who we are but it isn’t all we are. Being gay gives us a commonality but it isn’t always a binding one in itself. A lot of folks discover we don’t quite fit the stereotype(s) and are left searching for our own niche, hence the sub-cultures.

While beneficial on the surface, there is a danger of said sub-cultures if they become too defining. Identifying solely as such tends to limit one’s growth and self-expression. We become locked in an ideology that leaves very little room for change. Not to mention, it can also be very subjective. Ask 10 random people the definition of a [insert sub-culture of choice here] and I’ll bet no 2 answers will be the same. And then over time, what started as a simple attempt to fit in, becomes the very thing we sought to avoid.

Of course, our sexuality does play a huge part. Our attraction (or not) is often interwoven into all of the above. On the flip-side, it also has to do with our self-worth and feeling attractive. I’ve often said and it bears repeating attraction and acceptance are not the same thing. A very important and often over looked distinction.

For myself, I was fortunate enough to discover I didn’t need to fit one specific mold or stereotype to fit in. It didn’t happen right away mind you. There are aspects of my personality and id that cross several sub-cultures, cliques, or whatever and I’m cool with that. I work out w/o being a gym bunny or meat head. I have bearish qualities w/o being a bear. I can wear/appreciate leather w/o being absorbed by it. These are just a few, there are definitely more. Whether you identify w/a particular group, club, clique, gang, whatever you call it, I would encourage anyone reading this to allow yourself to accept others for who they are not what they represent. Don’t allow your attraction (or the lack of) influence your acceptance of others.

References

References
1 and by “gay”, I include the LGBT umbrella of folks.

8 thoughts on “To Bear or Not to Bear”

  1. This was very timely for me, and has given me a lot to think about. This is going to sound weird…but this was very well written. I felt like I was reading a magazine editorial.

  2. I think the bear community has always sort of been this way. I don't think they are as closed as the twinks or the circuit queens, but still.

    Unfortunately I haven't ever seemed to fit anywhere– not thin young, young enough, heavy enough, hairy enough, built enough…

  3. I found more fulfillment when I stopped looking only in the gay community. I do more and have more fun hanging out and working with mostly straight basset hound enthusiasts than I do doing anything "gay". At one time, years ago, I self identified as a bear, but mostly gave that up about the time I moved to SF, 8 years ago. I guess I had grown to where I didn't need the validation, I was comfortable with myself. I can't seem to fit in to anything group/culture/mass of gay people here doing anything, yet straight basset hound people think I'm tops. So, instead of going "woof" with a bunch of gay guys I do the basset howl "arooooo!" with a bunch of straight people and have a lot more fun and am a lot more comfortable. The one thing I do that I am proud of is my volunteer work as an AIDS counselor, but these days I work with 50/50 straight/gay, so the focus isn't orientation most of the time. I still have a friend from 15 years ago from AOL's chat room bears4bears who to this day lives as a bear with two cubs and every sentence they speak has some bear reference to it. I never was that bad, but I remember being around all that.

  4. I'm not particularly concerned about what one 'community' says. If they exclude, they're not much of a community – and when they change the parameters to fit their own changing looks or behaviour, well then, what is the point.

    It used to be 'bears' were hairier, masculine and bigger in stature men. Now you have to be morbidly obese to be called that. It sounds like a club for guys who like drive-thru a little too much.

  5. I too can dabble in many groups but my mainline is geek. Seriously, the field I work in and the company I work for right now has a high geek quotient. And I'm fitting right in.

Comments are closed.